Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Transit Casualty Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRODERICK, District Judge.
Defendant Transit Casualty Company (“Transit”) has moved this Court for a new trial or for a judgment n. o. v. After carefully considering all the grounds urged by defendant, this Court has determined that it must deny the motion.
This action was tried before a jury and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”). Plaintiff sought to recover from defendant, its insurer, losses in excess of $50,000 resulting from plaintiff’s liability for personal injury and property damage. Defendant argued at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Lawrence B. Thomas, and Cross-Appellant v. E. J. Korvette, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Dora v. DoraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Elliott-Lewis Corp. v. York-Shipley, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Taylor v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Kerry Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kravitz v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of USDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Rosera v. International Harvester Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1986
- St. Clair v. PipalDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.