Legal Opinion

The People v. Deal

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1934No. 22582. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Herrick

The plaintiffs in error, Harold Deal and Clarence Lemmons, (hereinafter called the defendants,) were by an indictment returned by a grand jury of Effingham county charged with the crime of robbery while armed with a dangerous weapon. They were tried by a jury, which returned a verdict of guilty. The motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment interposed by them were severally overruled and they were sentenced to the Illinois Reformatory at Pontiac for the indeterminate sentence fixed by the statute. To reverse the judgment of conviction they have sued out this writ of error.

Numerous…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. The People v. SwiftIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. GardinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. The People v. DesunoIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  5. People v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. The People v. TranowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. BiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. The PEOPLE v. DonaldsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  4. The People v. BlackIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  5. People v. CastilloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API