Legal Opinion

Cepeda v. Trolman & Glaser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered on or about June 12, 1998, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss plaintiffs legal malpractice action in its entirety, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants dismissing the complaint as against them.

Defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment should have been granted because plaintiffs assertions in opposition to summary judgment failed to raise a triable issue of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Luniewski v. ZeitlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Geraci v. Bauman, Greene & Kunkis, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alter & Alter v. CannellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API