Fidelity & Casualty Insurance v. Cigna/Pacific Employers Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
From the outset of the instant workers’ compensation case, there has never been any question but that the claimant is entitled to receive benefits. The dispute which does exist is solely between two insurance carriers as to which one bears the responsibility for paying the benefits to which the claimant is entitled. If the claimant’s current disability represents merely a worsened “change of condition” as regards his earlier employment-related injury, then appellant-Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company (F&C) is liable for his benefits. If, on the other hand, the claimant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gibbons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Stouffer Corp. v. HenkelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Avant Trucking Co. v. StallionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Aetna Insurance Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Gates v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Loper v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Contract Harvesters v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- CHEVROLET-PONTIAC-CANADA GROUP, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION v. MillarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Department of Public Safety v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Renew v. EdenfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.