Jones v. Baltimore City Police Dept.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentChasanow, Judge
In essence, the majority says that the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (LEOBR) requires a whole new trial — an administrative one this time — to determine whether Robert A. Jones has, indeed, committed the felonies he was already adjudged to have committed in a Maryland court of law. Until then, according to the majority, Jones is entitled to remain an officer of the law. The General Assembly could not have intended such a result.
We must remember Jones’ guilt is not in question. His culpability for violating the laws of this state by purveying child pornography was determined beyond…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- DiGrazia v. COUNTY EXEC. FOR MONT. CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Bowie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Langworthy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.