Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. Baltimore City Police Dept.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 12, 1992No. 126, September Term, 1991Published

1DissentChasanow, Judge

In essence, the majority says that the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (LEOBR) requires a whole new trial — an administrative one this time — to determine whether Robert A. Jones has, indeed, committed the felonies he was already adjudged to have committed in a Maryland court of law. Until then, according to the majority, Jones is entitled to remain an officer of the law. The General Assembly could not have intended such a result.

We must remember Jones’ guilt is not in question. His culpability for violating the laws of this state by purveying child pornography was determined beyond…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. DiGrazia v. COUNTY EXEC. FOR MONT. CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Bowie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Langworthy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API