Legal Opinion

Claim of Orzo v. Edo Aircraft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herlihy, J.

The claimant sustained a compensable injury on December 16, 1946 and that injury has been held to be the responsibility *358of the Special Fund. The board has apportioned the disability subsequent to a May, 1972 compensable accident as 75% causally related to the 1946 accident. The average weekly wage for the disability subsequent to the 1972 accident was set at the 1972 rate of $102.50, as sanctioned in prior judicial determinations. (See, e.g., Matter of Carle v New York Business Bldg. Corp., 11 AD2d 570.) Based on the percentage of responsibility, the award…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Meszaros v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. In re the Claim of CrawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Claim of Carle v. New York Business Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Horton v. McArdle & CasazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API