Claim of Orzo v. Edo Aircraft
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herlihy, J.
The claimant sustained a compensable injury on December 16, 1946 and that injury has been held to be the responsibility *358of the Special Fund. The board has apportioned the disability subsequent to a May, 1972 compensable accident as 75% causally related to the 1946 accident. The average weekly wage for the disability subsequent to the 1972 accident was set at the 1972 rate of $102.50, as sanctioned in prior judicial determinations. (See, e.g., Matter of Carle v New York Business Bldg. Corp., 11 AD2d 570.) Based on the percentage of responsibility, the award…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Meszaros v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In re the Claim of CrawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Claim of Carle v. New York Business Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
3Cited by1 opinion
- Horton v. McArdle & CasazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980