Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided December 6, 1976No. CIV-4-75-40PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERS
NEESE, District Judge.
The third-party defendant the United States of America (the government) moved for a dismissal of the third-party claim against it for lack of the Court’s jurisdiction of the subject matter and of its person and for failure of the third-party plaintiff to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against it. Rules 12(b)(1), (2), (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The third-party plaintiff Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) made a timely response thereto.
It is the principal contention of the government that the substantive (internal) law…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Hess v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Minero Chavez Huao v. Eric RokoskyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026