Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Pitchford
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Ee Flore County -; Action by Jane Ritchford against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
It is urged in the petition for rehearing, filed by counsel for plaintiff in error, that the original opinion failed to pass upon the objection that instructions numbered 4 and 5 misdirected the jury, in that no reference to the question of contributory negligence, qualifying plaintiff’s right of recovery, was submitted to the jury. Counsel’s position is correct. Under the condition of the record, the defense of contributory negligence was made an issue. There was sufficient evidence to have sent this question to the jury. Plaintiff’s signed statement of how…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BaroniSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RadfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Kenan v. HollowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Cole v. SearfossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- First Nat. Bank of Muskogee v. TevisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.