Legal Opinion
United States v. Criss E. Duncan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 22, 2007No. 05-4678PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Per curiam
In this successive appeal, Criss E. Duncan challenges the reasonableness of his sentence of 457 months’ imprisonment on the ground that application of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(B)(ii)’s mandatory minimum sentence of 360 months’ imprisonment resulted in an unwarranted disparity between his sentence and the sentence received by his codefendant, Ralph Berkey, Jr. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we conclude that the sentence imposed is reasonable under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and affirm the decision of the district court.
I
BACKGROUND
A
On May 27, 2003, Duncan and Berkey robbed the National City…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Robert MykytiukCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Nick S. BoscarinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BustamanteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. EasterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Donville JamesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.