Legal Opinion

Hoch v. Hoch (In re Hoch)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided September 20, 2017No. Case No.: 16-03678-5-JNC; Adversary Proceeding No.: 16-00123-5-JNCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ALLOWING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Joseph N. Callaway, United States Bankruptcy Judge

The matters before the court are the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Marilynn J. Hoch, individually and as trustee for the various trusts named in the case caption above (collectively, “Jane” or the “Debtor”) on February 2, 2017 (Dkt. 43; the “Jane Motion”), and the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by plaintiff Scott M. Hoch (“Scott”) on February 2, 2017 (Dkt. 44; the “Scott Motion”). Scott and Jane each objected to the summary judgment…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re SchweigerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  2. Mar-Bow Value Partners, LLC v. McKinsey Recovery & Transformation Services U.S., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
  3. Parton v. PartonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API