Legal Opinion
Futrell v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided March 20, 1984No. 64385Published
1Opinion of the Court
667 S.W.2d 404 (1984)
Edgar Vernell FUTRELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 64385.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
March 20, 1984.
L. Steven Goldblatt, St. Louis, for appellant.
John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Rosalynn Van Heest, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
RENDLEN, Chief Justice.
Appeal from dismissal of second Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant's challenge to the validity of § 556.280, RSMo 1969, brings the cause within this Court's exclusive appellate jurisdiction. Mo. Const., Art. V, § 3.
In February, 1977, movant Edgar Futrell was…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.