Legal Opinion
State v. Maddox
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 29, 2003No. 27455-8-IIPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
Christopher Dorian Maddox was convicted of two counts of possessing a controlled substance with intent to deliver. He contends on appeal that the police unlawfully searched his home. We affirm.
On or before September 15, 2000, an informant told the police that he had purchased methamphetamine from Maddox at least 35 times in the past four years, typically in *799“quantities up to four ounces!.]”1 The record does not show whether those purchases occurred at Maddox’s home.
On September 15, the informant arranged a controlled buy at Maddox’s house. The informant was searched by officers, furnished…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. MaddoxWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MaddoxWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Mark Edwin SellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- State v. HiggsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. TempleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.