Legal Opinion

Young v. Makar

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 14, 1991No. 2-90-0337PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Defendant’s attorney, Robert McWilliams, appeals from a trial court’s order holding him in contempt for informing the court he would not comply with its pretrial order prohibiting a private interview between him and the plaintiff’s treating physicians. At issue in this case is whether the prohibition against ex parte contact continues even after the physicians have been deposed and whether a defense attorney can be held in contempt for refusing to comply with that prohibition. We affirm the trial court’s order holding defense attorney McWilliams in contempt and prohibiting him from conducting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. People Ex Rel. Scott v. SilversteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. ShukovskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Karsten v. McCrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Renzulli v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Testin v. Dreyer Medical ClinicAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. In Re Medical Malpractice Cases PendingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Szfranski v. AzaranAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. In re Medical Malpractice Cases Pending in the Law DivisionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API