Hartman v. State Commission of Revenue & Taxation
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
The principal question presented by this appeal is the constitutionality of a portion of the 1935 income tax law, as *68later set forth. In the district court three separate actions involving the interests of three stockholders in the same corporation were consolidated and tried together and determined as one case. The facts are not in dispute and in stating the case we shall refer only to W. L. Hartman, for what is said as to him is applicable to the other two stockholders.
On May 23, 1933, Hartman, hereafter referred to as the taxpayer,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Colgate v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Peden v. STATE, KANSAS DEPT. OF REVENUESupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Von Ruden v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- Barker v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Board of Johnson County Comm'rs v. JordanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.