Board of Johnson County Comm'rs v. Jordan
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentStegall, J.
first, the majority applies the wrong test; and second, even applying the majority’s newly fashioned test, the Counties cannot demonstrate the *872unconstitutionality of K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 79-1460. Before discussing each of these flaws in todays decision, I first provide a short overview of tire history and purpose of K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 79-1460.
The History and Purpose of K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 79-1460
The challenged portions of K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 79-1460 together form a remedial measure designed to ensure the overall fairness and equality of an uncertain tax valuation process that is undeniably vulnerable…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Huntington v. WorthenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Wheeler v. WeightmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- State ex rel. Fatzer v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Addington v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.