Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 29, 2022No. 17-9001Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: April 29, 2022) IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND Takings case; preparations for trial of just BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- compensation for taking of permanent CONTROL RESERVOIRS flowage easement; motions in limine, for protective order, and for leave to use deposition testimony at trial. THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: ALL UPSTREAM CASES Daniel H. Charest and E. Lawrence Vincent, Burns Charest LLP, Dallas, Texas, Charles Irvine, Irvine & Conner PLLC, Houston, Texas, and Edwin Armistead Easterby, Williams Hart Boundas Easterby,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API