Legal Opinion

Jones-Molina v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 2011No. 1363 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*74OPINION BY

President Judge LEADBETTER.

The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which ordered SEPTA to pay first party medical benefits and uninsured motorist benefits to N. Morning Cloud Jones-Molina, and found that the Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan (Plan) had no liability to Jones-Molina. We reverse and remand for the entry of judgment against the Plan.

The facts of this ease are not in dispute. On February 14, 2005, Jones-Molina was on the way to visit her sister, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Adeyward v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Ellis v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. DunhamCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones-Molina v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API