Legal Opinion
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Dunham
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 7, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLINS, President Judge.
The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (Septa) appeals from the February 10, 1995 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (Common Pleas) that denied a motion for summary judgment filed by Septa with respect to a claim for first-party benefits filed by Renee Dunham (Dunham). The foregoing order certified for appellate review Septa’s interlocutory appeal under Section 702(b) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b).1
The record indicates that on January 10, 1992, Dunham exited from the Number 21 Septa bus at 60th and Walnut Streets,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Love v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Adeyward v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Gielarowski v. Port AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones-Molina v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Jones-Molina v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Jones-Molina v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Lehigh & Northampton Transportation Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County2003
- Walker v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1999