Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Volvo North America Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 28, 1989No. 87-1272PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

554 So.2d 927 (1989)

Joyce SCHWARTZ and Michael Schwartz

v.

VOLVO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and Aktiebolaget Volvo.

87-1272.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 28, 1989.

Rehearing Denied November 17, 1989.

James R. Pratt III and R. Ben Hogan III of Hogan, Smith, Alspaugh, Samples & Pratt, Birmingham, for appellants.

De Martenson and D. Alan Thomas of Huie, Fernambucq & Stewart, Birmingham, and Harry Cole of Hill, Hill, Carter, Franco, Cole & Black, Montgomery, for appellees Volvo North America Corp., Aktiebolaget Volvo and Volvo Car Corp.

Arthur H. Bryant, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Trial Lawyers…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent; Concurrence · Maddox; Concurrence · Adams.

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hannah v. Gregg, Bland & Berry, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Ex Parte Uniroyal Tire Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Brooks v. Colonial Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Galo Coba v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  5. General Motors Corp. v. JerniganSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API