Parlett v. Blake
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal, from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. In Bankruptcy. Petition by George F. Parlett and another to recover possession of certain furniture against Daniel F. Blake, trustee in bankruptcy of Hallack-Deamer Carpet Company. From an -order dismissing the petition, affirmed by the District Court, petitioners appeal.
Read the full summary
Appeal, from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. In Bankruptcy. Petition by George F. Parlett and another to recover possession of certain furniture against Daniel F. Blake, trustee in bankruptcy of Hallack-Deamer Carpet Company. From an -order dismissing the petition, affirmed by the District Court, petitioners appeal. On June 19, 190S, the I-Iallack-Deamer Carpet Company, the bankrupt, made a written contract with the Coppes, Zook & Mutschler Company of Nappannee, Ind., as follows: “This agreement entered into this 19th day of June, 1908, between…
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). In the view we take of this case it is unimportant to dwell upon the arrangement between George E. Parlett and his wife, Anna B. Parlett, in-terveners here, and the two consignor companies. Suffice it to say the evidence shows that the Carpet Company was at the time of the transfer insolvent, and that the Parletts paid no consideration to that company' for the goods transferred to them. If, therefore, the goods belonged to the Carpet Company the transfer was without consideration and in fraud of the rights of its creditors. If they belonged to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- John Deere Plow Co. v. McDavidCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- In re GaltCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
- Arbuckle Bros. v. Gates & BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re HarrisDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1913
- Reliance Shoe Co. v. ManlyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
- In Re United States Electrical Supply Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1924
- In re ReynoldsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1912