Legal Opinion

Seago v. Bell

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided January 12, 1989No. 09-88-067-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIES, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the entry of a judgment nunc pro tunc in a trespass to try title suit filed by Mr. and Mrs. Charles Bell against Mr. and Mrs. Belton Seago. The Bells held record title to the property in dispute, and the Seagos claimed title by limitation.

A bench trial was held on January 16, 1987. The trial court found in favor of the Bells. The trial court then relied upon counsel for the Bells to draft a judgment containing a correct description of the property to be awarded to the Bells. The surveyor hired by the Bells to survey the property to be awarded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Comet Aluminum Company v. DibrellTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Dikeman v. SnellTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Finlay v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Nolan v. BettisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Wallace v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. America's Favorite Chicken Co. v. Galvan, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  2. Gray v. Turner, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1991
  3. Bryan v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Seago v. Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API