Pogor v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Makita, U.S.A., Inc., and Makita Electric Works, Ltd. (collectively “Makita”), appeal a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs William and Janet Pogor in this diversity products liability action brought under Michigan law. Makita argues that the district court erred by: (1) failing to grant Makita’s motion for a judgment as a matter of law (JNOV) based upon plaintiffs’ failure to present sufficient evidence to support their claims of defective design and failure to warn; (2) awarding plaintiffs $10,000 for future medical expenses; and (3) awarding *386p…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Duane Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Robert L. Kosnoski v. James R. Howley Howley Group Limited, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by22 opinions
- Crowe v. BolducCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- In Re Anna Marie Walter, Debtor. Jerry Pruzinsky v. Silvio Gianetti Gianetti Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Vincent McCalla v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Winslow v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Stryker Corporation v. XL Insurance AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.