Legal Opinion
Winslow v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 1, 2009No. 08-5228PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH.
KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge:
After losing his job as an attorney at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, John Winslow sued and prevailed on an age discrimination claim. The District Court awarded back pay; the court’s order did not include prejudgment interest. Several years later, Winslow moved for prejudgment interest, which he claimed was mandatory under the Back Pay Act. The District Court treated Winslow’s claim as a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. The problem for Winslow was that Rule 59(e) motions must be filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Dorcely, DanielCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Crowe v. BolducCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- James E. Brown v. Secretary of the Army. Wellington Mitchell v. Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Vincent McCalla v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sandra Omar v. John M. McHughCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Charles Mack v. John YostCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
- CONTINENTAL TRANSFERT TECHNIQUE LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA, Et Al., DefendantsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- In re Am. Express Anti-Steering Rules Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- United States v. Concord Mgmt. & Consulting LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.