Legal Opinion

Blake v. Professional Travel Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2001No. 99-CV-1495PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

Blake appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing on the ground of forum non conveniens her complaint alleging, inter alia, sexual discrimination in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act. We agree with Blake that the defendants have not met their burden of establishing reasons why her choice of forum should not be respected. In particular, the close factual connection between the District of Columbia and the discriminatory acts alleged, together with the absence of any genuine showing of inconvenience to the defendant-appellees, persuades us…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Coramae Ella Gary v. James Edward LongCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Pain v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rolinski v. LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Dennis v. EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Nixon Peabody LLP v. BeaupreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Garcia v. AA Roofing Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. WILLIAM GARCIA v. AA ROOFING COMPANY, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API