Legal Opinion
Rusk v. Rusk
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 1993No. 62836PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Judge.
Husband and wife’s marriage was dissolved in 1989. Wife was awarded $612.65 per month in maintenance. When husband failed to make certain payments, wife garnished his pension benefits through the Public School Retirement System (garnishee).
Husband and garnishee moved to quash. The trial court denied the motion and they appeal. We affirm.
I. Retirement Funds Not Exempt
We consider husband’s and garnishee’s first and second points together. They allege the trial court erred in overruling their motion to quash. They claim §§ 169.-090 * and .587 exempt the pension funds “from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Abrams v. Ohio Pacific ExpressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- David Ranken, Jr. Technical Institute v. BoykinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Pugh v. St. Louis Police Relief Assn.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1944
- Hopkins v. HopkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Catonsville Nursing Home, Inc. v. LovemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Smith v. Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement SystemMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Richard W. Noble v. Linda L. NobleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Sisco v. Bd. of Trus. of Police Retire. Sys.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Capital One Bank v. EDISON CREDIT UNIONMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.