Hayden v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 25 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Myers’ Civil Code, secs. 373, 379, 299, 584, and notes 488 and 491. CITED— Civil Code, 4th sub-section of section 579. 11 B. Mon., 219.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PETERS
delivered the opinion op the court:
Prior to August, 1865, L. R. Queen and Frank Curran were engaged in distilling, as partners, under the firm name of L. R. Queen & Co. Before the partnership was dissolved L. R. Queen died, leaving appellant, PI. A. *108Hayden, then H. A Queen, Ms widow, who subsequently married appellant, Q. F. Hayden.
L. R. Queen died intestate, and administration on Ms estate was granted to L. M. Queen, his brother, and he and Curran continued the business of distilling under the old firm name of L. R. Queen & Co.; and in 1865 executed a note to appellee, Moore, in…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. Gernert Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Cleveland v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Davidson v. Kentucky Coal Lands Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Winkler v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Kingsley v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.