Huffmire v. Town of Boothbay
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
The Court issued an order sua sponte requesting the parties to file written memo-randa regarding the Court’s jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case. The Plaintiffs, Madelyn and George Huffmire, (“the Huffmires”) in this action assert that the Court has both diversity and federal question jurisdiction. The Defendants (referred to collectively as “Boothbay”) disagree that the Court has either diversity or federal question jurisdiction. In addition, Boothbay asserts that even if the Court has jurisdiction over the subject…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kilroy v. MayhewDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012
- King v. York Golf and Tennis ClubDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002