Legal Opinion

Foos v. Steinberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 5, 1967No. [No. 338, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.

On November 27, 1962, appellants, Anna E. Foos, et vir, filed suit in the Superior Court of Baltimore City against ap pellee, Doctor Murray Steinberg, alleging medical malpractice. On January 3, 1963, appellants, pursuant to an order of court, filed an amended declaration which was the same as the original declaration except that it corrected the appellee’s name and address. The acts of malpractice were alleged to have occurred when the appellee failed to remove a surgical sponge from appellant’s vaginal cavity following an operation in April of 1959, to repair a rectovaginal fistula. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Lichtenberg v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Snyder v. CearfossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Hutton v. MarxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  5. Stockett v. SasscerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Waddell v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Baker, Watts & Co. v. Miles & StockbridgeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. State v. SharafeldinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Colao v. COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Murphy v. Liberty Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API