Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Clarke

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for judicial direction that the payment of taxes upon certain premises be paid from the rents, issues and profits, and that a receiver be appointed for such purpose.

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

The plaintiff is one of the heirs -at law of David Clarke, who died in 1874, leaving a will, which was admitted to probate, and letters testamentary were issued to Ezra Jones, who was nominated as executor by the will. He continued to act as such until in December, 1878, when he was removed from such relation, and letters of administration with the will annexed were granted to Eliza W." Clarke, the defendant, who was the widow of the testator.

By his will he gave his wife (the defendant) $700 and the household furniture and personal property in" the homestead premises, except certain specified…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kerr v. . BlodgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. McKenzie v. L'AmoureuxNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Cairns v. ChabertNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  4. Brown v. RickettsNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  5. Isenhart v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1832

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hilton Bridge Construction Co. v. FosterNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Clark v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API