Hilton Bridge Construction Co. v. Foster
New York Supreme Court
Demübbeb to complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtChester, J.
The defendant Rockerfeller demurs to the complaint on the grounds: First, that there is a defect of parties; and, second, that the complaint does not state a cause of action.
The plaintiff sues for itself as well as for others similarly situated. The suit is brought to procure an adjudication that certain receiver’s certificates are a first lien upon what is known as the Lebanon Springs railroad, and for the foreclosure of such lien.
The complaint alleges that such certificates to the amount of $23,000 were issued in' sums of $1,000 each, pursuant to the order of the court to pay the plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wallace v. LoomisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Jagger Iron Co. v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Kerr v. . BlodgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- McKenzie v. L'AmoureuxNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- Roberts v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Climax Specialty Co. v. Seneca Button Co.New York Supreme Court · 1907
- Costa v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Wohlfarth v. National Export Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1907