Legal Opinion
Pedersen v. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 7, 1980No. 7297-8-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
The plaintiffs, all owners of homes abutting Arrow Lake, filed suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to abate a storm water runoff system. After plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction was denied, they sought leave to amend their complaint, adding allegations that the defendants had failed to comply with a federal environmental statute 1 and a King County ordinance. 2 The trial judge permitted the amendment and the defendants moved for partial summary judgment, seeking dismissal of the amended complaint. The trial judge granted defendants' motion. We reverse in part.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Appalachian Power Company v. Russell E. Train, as Administrator Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. CostleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. TrainDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. State Employees' Insurance BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Austin v. JamailCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Pedersen v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- DEP'T OF TRANSPORTATION v. SeibWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Pedersen v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.