Legal Opinion

Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Reynolds

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 10, 1986No. 01-84-00414-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOM COLEMAN, Retired Judge.

Carl David Reynolds was severely injured when he used an aluminum pole to touch a powerline that ran through a residential neighborhood. This is an appeal from a judgment awarding him substantial damages based on a jury verdict. A major contention of Houston Lighting & Power Company in this appeal is that there is no strict products liability cause of action against electric utility companies for injuries caused by contact with high voltage distribution lines.

Carl David, a 16 year-old boy, was visiting at the home of a friend, Eric Everroad. While they were…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Genaust v. Illinois Power Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. ReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Otte v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Grant v. Southwestern Electric Power Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  4. JSC Neftegas-Impex v. Citibank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. Smith v. Home Light and Power Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API