Legal Opinion

Good Milking Machine Co. v. Galloway

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 23, 1915PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Black Hawk District Court. — Hon. C. "W. Mullan, Judge. Action to reform a contract. Decree for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

The plaintiff and defendants entered into a written agreement by the terms of which the defendants agreed to purchase and pay for certain milking machines, and to pay a royalty upon certain can valves and pulsators. The action is brought to recover these royalties claimed to be due under the contract.

The defendants answered plaintiff’s petition, the material part of which is to the effect that the contract, as written, did not express the true agreement of the parties; that the contract, as actually entered into between the parties, provided that either party should have the right and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Marshall v. WestropeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. McTucker v. TaggartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Stewart v. McArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  2. MacGuire v. Harriscope Broadcasting Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lynch v. PattersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Thomasi v. KochWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Crompton v. BruceWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API