Legal Opinion

Pickard v. City of Vero Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 15, 1993No. 93-2240PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FASTRACK APPEAL

2Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s entry of summary judgment holding that appellant’s vehicle was subject to forfeiture after appellant used the vehicle to travel to a drug store to pick up an illegal drug prescription. See Duckham v. State, 478 So.2d 347 (Fla.1985); In re Forfeiture of 1986 Ford PU, 619 So.2d 337 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). However, the parties agree the appellant is still entitled to have the trial court consider his claim that a forfeiture would violate the prohibition on excessive fines contained in the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. See Austin v.…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Duckham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Brooks v. GillumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gilbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API