Brooks v. Gillum
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LEHAN, Acting Chief Judge.
Appellant challenges the forfeiture of his pickup truck by appellee, raising five points on appeal. We affirm.
Appellant first argues that his due process rights were violated because appellee failed to give him immediate notice of his right to request an adversary hearing upon the seizure of his truck, as required by Dep’t of Law Enforcement v. Real Property, 588 So.2d 957, 965 (Fla.1991) (hereafter DLE). It is true that appellee’s petition for rule to show cause, filed on October 2, 1991, failed to give such notice. At that point, appellant’s truck had already been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Department of Law Enf. v. Real PropertySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Duckham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- In Re Estate of ZimbrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- City of Edgewood v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- James A. Cummings Inc. v. LarsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Pickard v. City of Vero BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993