Legal Opinion

Dallas v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 26, 2010No. 17 September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBERA, Judge.

Petitioner Isaac E. Dallas was convicted of possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute that controlled dangerous substance and related offenses. During trial, Petitioner sought a ruling concerning whether the court would permit the State, under Maryland Rule 5-609,1 to impeach him with two felony drug convictions if he testified. The court decided *572that any ruling concerning the admissibility of such evidence must await Petitioner’s direct testimony, if any. Petitioner elected not to testify.

Petitioner contends that the court’s deferral of its ruling on the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burnside v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. People v. Hall, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Artisan Builders, Inc. v. Jang, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Dallas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API