Legal Opinion

Burkholder v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 25, 2006No. 3:02CV7422PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARR, Chief Judge.

This is a dispute between machine repairmen and the International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local. No. 12 (Local 12) regarding the distribution of certain job duties at the Daimler-Chrysler Jeep Plant in Toledo, Ohio. Plaintiffs argue Local 12 breached its duty of fair representation to them, as members.

Jurisdiction exists under 29 U.S.C. § 159(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1337.

Pending is plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. For the following reasons, that motion will be denied.

Background

Plaintiffs are machine…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Columbia River Packers Assn., Inc. v. HintonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Nightclubs, Inc.,plaintiff-Appellant v. City of PaducahCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dragomier v. Local 1112 International Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement WorkersDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  2. Marzillo v. United Auto Workers Local 551District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API