Legal Opinion

Toothman v. Concel, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 1983No. A8012-07196; CA A26308Published

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Third-party plaintiffs, Concel, Inc. and APL Corporation (Concel), appeal from a summary judgment for third-party defendant Boise-Cascade (Boise) on Concel’s claim for indemnity.

The case arose from a personal injury suffered by a Boise employe operating a paper machine owned by Concel but located in Boise’s paper mill in St. Helens. Boise and Concel entered into a contract in 1968, under which Boise agreed to

“operate, service and maintain [Concel’s] paper machine up to full capacity * * * as Concel may direct * * * including the furnishing of all labor, materials, parts, supplies and sundries…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Kaiser Gypsum Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Gleason v. International Multifoods Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Boldman v. Mt. Hood Chemical Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API