Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
103 F.3d 767
45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 913, 96 Cal. Daily Op.
Serv. 9090,
96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,085
Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-15779.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 18, 1996.
Decided Dec. 17, 1996.
Mark Lane, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant.
Robert A. Swift, Kohn, Swift & Graf, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Jon M. Van Dyke, Honolulu, Hawai'i, for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i; Manuel L. Real, District…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- (PC) Allen v. BotkinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PC) Brown v. ReifDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PC) Eleby v. VoongDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Howell v. LiddellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Scherffius v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019