(PC) Howell v. Liddell
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAREEM J. HOWELL, No. 2:19-cv-0578 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 M. LIDDELL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Introduction 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment on 20 the grounds that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 40.) Alternatively, 21 defendants request an evidentiary hearing as to any disputed factual issues.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.