Legal Opinion

Bosnick v. Lockhart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 29, 1984No. 84-97PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, David Bosnick, has filed a motion for costs pursuant to Rule 24 of the Supreme Court Rules. The Attorney General did not file a response to the motion. Rule 24 provides that where, as here, an appellant succeeds in having the trial court’s ruling reversed, he may recover brief costs at the amount allowed per page, not to exceed $300.00, filing fee and record fee.

The appellant alleged in his motion that he has incurred costs of $100.00 for the filing fee; $114.60 for the record fee; and $56.00 for brief reproduction. The costs related to the brief reproduction will be determined by…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bosnick v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Michalek v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Howard Togo Wood v. Arkansas Parole Board, John Felts, and Andy ShockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022
  4. Rogers v. KnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Richmond v. DukeDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API