Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Odgren

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 2009PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

We consider whether the Commonwealth, in a criminal case, may seek the production of records from a third party in advance of trial or an evidentiary hearing by issuing a subpoena duces tecum directly to the party under G. L. c. 277, § 68, or whether it must first obtain judicial approval, pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 17 (a) (2), 378 Mass. 885 (1979), as construed by Commonwealth v. Jjimpron, 441 Mass. 265, 268-271 (2004) (Lampron). We conclude that it must first obtain judicial approval.1

Background. On January 19, 2007, the defendant, then sixteen years of age, was arraigned in the District…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. BishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. VinnieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Preventive Medicine Associates, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. KastnerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. OdgrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. ChamberlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API