Legal Opinion

Dusenbury v. . Hulbert

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1875PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is a contest for priority of mortgages. There are two aspects in which to consider the plaintiff's mortgage, one as a prior and the other as a subsequent lien. If it is to be deemed as executed and delivered on the first day of April the question is, whether it was a prior lien to that of the Bowen mortgage. I think it very clear that it was not. It would attach, as between the parties, to whatever equitable interest La Grange had by virtue of his contract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williamson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Dickerson v. TillinghastNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  3. Cary v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Wood v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Jackson ex dem. Watson v. McKennyNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Seymour v. . McKinstryNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Greenpoint Sugar Co. v. . WhitinNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Coman v. . LakeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Ebling Brewing Co. v. GennaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Schoch v. BirdsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API