Legal Opinion

People v. Rich

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1960No. Crim. 6545PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Defendant was charged with burglary of a market (Count I), kidnaping of Maude MeDougall (Count II) and Euldene Hughes (Count III) in violation of section 207, Penal Code, assault with a deadly weapon upon Ronald Guilmett (Count IV), and kidnaping of Ivry Glamore (Count V); and with three prior felony convictions, which he admitted. A jury found him guilty as charged and the burglary to be second degree. The trial court denied his motion for a new trial and sentenced him to the state prison. Inasmuch as defendant has not specified the matters from which he appeals, we will treat his appeal as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. HightowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. SalazarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Laurel v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API