Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Laurel v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 1967No. Civ. 32061PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

This is a petition for writ of prohibition following a denial of motion under Penal Code section 995.

Laurel, the petitioner here, and his codefendant, Russell, were charged by amended information with the following counts: (I) solicitation of one Beverford to join in the commission of a robbery (Pen. Code, § 653f); (II) robbery of one Simpkins (Pen. Code, § 211) ; (III) kidnaping one Simpkins for the purpose of robbery (Pen. Code, § 209) ; (IV) robbery of one King (Pen. Code, § 211); (V) kidnaping of one King (Pen. Code, § 209) ; (VI) kidnaping of one Salazar (Pen. Code, § 209); (VII)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. RissmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. People v. HumphreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. People v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. People v. LipinskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. LoveAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
  5. People v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API