Legal Opinion

Cornell Steamboat Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 3, 1944No. 384PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

Cornell operates tugboats for hire on the Hudson River and in and about New York harbor. Its tugs carry no cargo but move scows, barges, and similar vessels belonging to others which themselves usually carry cargo. This towing service Cornell offers to perform for the public in general. About ninety-five per cent of the vessels which it serves are moved from points in New York to other points in the same State, but these movements generally traverse New Jersey as well as New York waters. Part III of the Interstate Commerce Act1 provides that contract or common carriers by water in interstate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Hanley v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Propeller Niagara v. CordesSupreme Court of the United States · 1859

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. MealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co. v. River Terminals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API