Legal Opinion
Yarnall v. Mendez
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 10, 2007No. Civ. 05-527-SLR, 06-501-SLR, 06-529-SLRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff David S. Yarnall (“Yarnall”), who proceeds pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as a result of actions taken during his arrest on May 11, 2005, by defendants State Trooper Cpl. Anthony Mendez (“Mendez”) and Millsboro police officers PTLM Lowe (“Lowe”) and PFC Buchert (“Buchert”). Also named as a defendant is Delaware State Police Troop 7 (“State Police”). Presently before the court are motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiff (D.I.74, 75, 91, 94), Mendez and the State Police…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doe v. Delaware State PoliceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Austin v. Redford Township Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Bethea v. DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- BISHOP v. UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Miller v. MachogaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.