Legal Opinion
People v. King
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the People should have been precluded from using a statement made by defendant to a correction officer based on their failure to file a CPL 710.30 notice with respect to that statement. Defendant was convicted of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate (Penal Law § 240.32) for having thrown urine and feces at the correction officer, and the statement was made by defendant to the correction officer immediately after that act. We agree with County Court that a CPL 710.30 notice was not required under these…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. McCaskellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. CopesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Garcia-LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. FinleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. MerrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006