Legal Opinion

State v. Groppel

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2018No. 7313 S-16592PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOWERS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

When a criminal defendant asserts the defense of insanity or diminished capacity or the defendant's mental fitness otherwise is at issue, AS 12.47.070 requires the court to appoint two qualified psychiatrists or two psychologists certified by the American Board of Forensic Psychology to examine the defendant. This case presents the questions whom these experts serve, how they are to be chosen, and who must bear their costs. We answer that these are the court's experts, that Alaska Psychiatric Institute (API) must provide them if API employs experts with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schade v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. DarrowAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Pope v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Bartley v. State, Department of Administration, Teachers' Retirement BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. KorkowAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Black v. Whitestone Estates Condo. Homeowners' Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Marquinn Jones-Nelson v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API