Bartley v. State, Department of Administration, Teachers' Retirement Board
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
I. INTRODUCTION
After teaching for seven years with the North Slope Borough School District, Coralie and William Bartley retired under a retirement incentive program offered through Aaska’s Teachers’ Retirement System (“TRS” or “system”), a retirement plan for Aaska teachers administered by the Department of Administration, Division of Retirements and Benefits. 1 Athough the Bartleys expected to qualify for normal retirement, the division determined that they were eligible only for early retirement; the division also calculated that-they owed substantially more than they had expected to…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- National Bank of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by31 opinions
- Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Ward v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. DarrowAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.