Legal Opinion

Bartley v. State, Department of Administration, Teachers' Retirement Board

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2005No. S-10392PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

After teaching for seven years with the North Slope Borough School District, Coralie and William Bartley retired under a retirement incentive program offered through Aaska’s Teachers’ Retirement System (“TRS” or “system”), a retirement plan for Aaska teachers administered by the Department of Administration, Division of Retirements and Benefits. 1 Athough the Bartleys expected to qualify for normal retirement, the division determined that they were eligible only for early retirement; the division also calculated that-they owed substantially more than they had expected to…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. National Bank of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by31 opinions

  1. Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Ward v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. DarrowAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API